Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The new Christian Forum
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 2780841" data-attributes="member: 7900"><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Maybe I'm oversimplified, but you also seem to be talking around the scientific progression of Hypothesis, Theory, and Law. Or, has science decided that the progression is no longer valid? If not, has evolution reached the level of Law? As for Dawkins, you also didn't answer my question about laughing off the scientists that Strobel interviewed for his books, so if you don't recognize their contributions to science, then why should I recognize the contributions of a scientist that seems to be totally anti-God?</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Maybe I'm being jaded here, but over the years, we've seen the results of "scientists" that declared eggs, butter, meat, and who knows what else, to be bad, only to find later that those things aren't as harmful as those "scientists" declared. We see the same thing in the climate science area. While there are some scientists claiming global warming is happening, there seems to be a lot more scientists saying that it is a normal cycle and that the climate is cooling.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 2780841, member: 7900"] [FONT=Georgia][SIZE=3]Maybe I'm oversimplified, but you also seem to be talking around the scientific progression of Hypothesis, Theory, and Law. Or, has science decided that the progression is no longer valid? If not, has evolution reached the level of Law? As for Dawkins, you also didn't answer my question about laughing off the scientists that Strobel interviewed for his books, so if you don't recognize their contributions to science, then why should I recognize the contributions of a scientist that seems to be totally anti-God? Maybe I'm being jaded here, but over the years, we've seen the results of "scientists" that declared eggs, butter, meat, and who knows what else, to be bad, only to find later that those things aren't as harmful as those "scientists" declared. We see the same thing in the climate science area. While there are some scientists claiming global warming is happening, there seems to be a lot more scientists saying that it is a normal cycle and that the climate is cooling. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The new Christian Forum
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom