Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 2780853" data-attributes="member: 24">I&#039;m not talking around it..... I&#039;m just trying to explain what laws of science really entail, and it&#039;s more difficult because you have a seemingly lower fundamental understanding of science.&nbsp; Here&#039;s a link that will simplify what I&#039;m saying.<a href="http://evolutionfaq.com/faq/why-isnt-evolution-considered-law" target="_blank">http://evolutionfaq.com/faq/why-isnt-evolution-considered-law</a>What you don&#039;t understand about Strobel is the level of bias and emotion.&nbsp; I don&#039;t require you to read Dawkins or even &quot;believe&quot; what he says.&nbsp; However, there has to be an acknowledgement of significant reference and logical application of proven phenomenon in lieu of ..... &quot;I interviewed a few scientists.&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp; It&#039;s a glorified media report in book form that you just happen to agree with.&nbsp; More power to you.In terms of you being jaded towards science because of eggs and global warming, then you are a puppet of the media.&nbsp; You see the media cherry picks segments of scientific studies and applies sensationalism to generate revenue or create an agenda.&nbsp; Unless you have been reading scientific journals for years, you&#039;re getting an interpretation of what was actually written or conducted.&nbsp; If you are really curious as to what scientist have said about eggs or global warming, then read the actual work.... not what MSM says.&nbsp; Finally, shouldn&#039;t we leave the science to the scientists and religion to the religious?&nbsp; If you feel differently then you might want to look at a little history.&nbsp; Such as how christians responded to Galileo&#039;s findings back in the day.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JD8, post: 2780853, member: 24"] I'm not talking around it..... I'm just trying to explain what laws of science really entail, and it's more difficult because you have a seemingly lower fundamental understanding of science. Here's a link that will simplify what I'm saying. [url]http://evolutionfaq.com/faq/why-isnt-evolution-considered-law[/url] What you don't understand about Strobel is the level of bias and emotion. I don't require you to read Dawkins or even "believe" what he says. However, there has to be an acknowledgement of significant reference and logical application of proven phenomenon in lieu of ..... "I interviewed a few scientists." It's a glorified media report in book form that you just happen to agree with. More power to you. In terms of you being jaded towards science because of eggs and global warming, then you are a puppet of the media. You see the media cherry picks segments of scientific studies and applies sensationalism to generate revenue or create an agenda. Unless you have been reading scientific journals for years, you're getting an interpretation of what was actually written or conducted. If you are really curious as to what scientist have said about eggs or global warming, then read the actual work.... not what MSM says. Finally, shouldn't we leave the science to the scientists and religion to the religious? If you feel differently then you might want to look at a little history. Such as how christians responded to Galileo's findings back in the day. [/QUOTE]

Verification