Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The next media circus around gun control is here.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 2099868" data-attributes="member: 7900"><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Some here may need to do more "googling" to find the manifesto of Dorner. It clearly has the AWB text in it. Check out the link below to his manifesto. However, someone went on a rampage to redact a bunch of stuff. The part about the AWB starts on page 10 of the manifesto.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Some news stories I've found referred to there being two parts. This was found as an LA Times story. I can't explain why it is that so much was redacted. Perhaps the media thinking we can't handle some stuff.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><a href="http://documents.latimes.com/christopher-dorner-manifesto/" target="_blank">Christopher Dorner Manifesto</a></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><a href="http://documents.latimes.com/christopher-dorner-manifesto/" target="_blank"></a></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">OK. I just found a second "copy" of the manifesto. This one is NOT redacted. It has the AWB text as well, but it isn't as neatly spelled out in pages.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><a href="http://laist.com/2013/02/07/christopher_dorners_manifesto_in_fu.php" target="_blank">Un-redacted Christopher Dorner Manifesto</a></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Also, there is this in Dorner's manifesto. In fact, it immediately precedes his comment about the AWB.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">"The Violence of action will be HIGH. I am the reason TAC alert was established. I will bring unconventional and asymmetrical warfare to those in LAPD uniform whether on or off duty."</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">From that statement, don't you think it reasonable and prudent for ANY law enforcement officer to be on high alert? While I don't condone the shooting of the ladies delivering papers, I can understand why such an event could happen.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Dormer is not the normal "bad-guy" here because he knows so much about law enforcement policy and procedures. He likely knows what will cause an officer to hesitate, thus taking advantage of that hesitation. He is also likely to have very good tactical abilities and reasoning.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">To me, it is likely he torched his own truck for three reasons, 1( destruction of evidence that would possibly be in the truck; 2( destruction of the truck so he can draw law enforcement to the mountains; and 3( he has likely already had a vehicle stashed or stole one to then get away from the area. Who knows, since it is known that he had ties to Enid, Oklahoma, who is to say he couldn't show up in Oklahoma?</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px">Now, this comment is not directed towards anyone in particular on the OSA forums, but as quickly as some here tend to go off half-cocked on issues discussed on the forums in general (not specifically just this thread), I would think that we should consider that when accusing the police of "shooting first and asking questions later."</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 2099868, member: 7900"] [FONT=Georgia][SIZE=3]Some here may need to do more "googling" to find the manifesto of Dorner. It clearly has the AWB text in it. Check out the link below to his manifesto. However, someone went on a rampage to redact a bunch of stuff. The part about the AWB starts on page 10 of the manifesto. Some news stories I've found referred to there being two parts. This was found as an LA Times story. I can't explain why it is that so much was redacted. Perhaps the media thinking we can't handle some stuff. [URL="http://documents.latimes.com/christopher-dorner-manifesto/"]Christopher Dorner Manifesto [/URL] OK. I just found a second "copy" of the manifesto. This one is NOT redacted. It has the AWB text as well, but it isn't as neatly spelled out in pages. [URL="http://laist.com/2013/02/07/christopher_dorners_manifesto_in_fu.php"]Un-redacted Christopher Dorner Manifesto[/URL] Also, there is this in Dorner's manifesto. In fact, it immediately precedes his comment about the AWB. "The Violence of action will be HIGH. I am the reason TAC alert was established. I will bring unconventional and asymmetrical warfare to those in LAPD uniform whether on or off duty." From that statement, don't you think it reasonable and prudent for ANY law enforcement officer to be on high alert? While I don't condone the shooting of the ladies delivering papers, I can understand why such an event could happen. Dormer is not the normal "bad-guy" here because he knows so much about law enforcement policy and procedures. He likely knows what will cause an officer to hesitate, thus taking advantage of that hesitation. He is also likely to have very good tactical abilities and reasoning. To me, it is likely he torched his own truck for three reasons, 1( destruction of evidence that would possibly be in the truck; 2( destruction of the truck so he can draw law enforcement to the mountains; and 3( he has likely already had a vehicle stashed or stole one to then get away from the area. Who knows, since it is known that he had ties to Enid, Oklahoma, who is to say he couldn't show up in Oklahoma? Now, this comment is not directed towards anyone in particular on the OSA forums, but as quickly as some here tend to go off half-cocked on issues discussed on the forums in general (not specifically just this thread), I would think that we should consider that when accusing the police of "shooting first and asking questions later." [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The next media circus around gun control is here.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom