Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The number of children killed in the next school shooting may be much higher
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="uncle money bags" data-source="post: 2020257" data-attributes="member: 8377"><p>Exactly my point. The question is what can the shrink do with this info? If the shrink believes the person to be sincere about killing people, why would she not tell some body?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You and I are having the conversation and several people are reading it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you are under the misconception that I have suggested that our agreement in not letting "mental" persons own a gun is some sort of panacea or would have some huge impact on stopping people who should not possess a gun from getting one. I certainly dont believe it is. Further, it wont stop anybody from stealing a gun to use in another crime. I stick by my definition of "mental" for this conversation because that is the legally accepted threshold for denying some body their right to own a firearm.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="uncle money bags, post: 2020257, member: 8377"] Exactly my point. The question is what can the shrink do with this info? If the shrink believes the person to be sincere about killing people, why would she not tell some body? You and I are having the conversation and several people are reading it. I think you are under the misconception that I have suggested that our agreement in not letting "mental" persons own a gun is some sort of panacea or would have some huge impact on stopping people who should not possess a gun from getting one. I certainly dont believe it is. Further, it wont stop anybody from stealing a gun to use in another crime. I stick by my definition of "mental" for this conversation because that is the legally accepted threshold for denying some body their right to own a firearm. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The number of children killed in the next school shooting may be much higher
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom