Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The plot thickens.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 4018247" data-attributes="member: 7900"><p>When I was on a school board, the board could go into what was called "executive session" where everyone was out of the room except the school board and the school superintendent. I would think that if their situation was that they were in an "executive session," it is NOT considered a public meeting, and if that were the case here, the recording might very well be illegal.</p><p></p><p>Now, if this occurred AFTER the meeting was done and deemed as closed, they were still in a public place and the recording might be legitimate, although I thought that such recordings in Oklahoma required at least one participant to know of the recording. But, with the reporter out of the room and his recorder in the room, that one is questionable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 4018247, member: 7900"] When I was on a school board, the board could go into what was called "executive session" where everyone was out of the room except the school board and the school superintendent. I would think that if their situation was that they were in an "executive session," it is NOT considered a public meeting, and if that were the case here, the recording might very well be illegal. Now, if this occurred AFTER the meeting was done and deemed as closed, they were still in a public place and the recording might be legitimate, although I thought that such recordings in Oklahoma required at least one participant to know of the recording. But, with the reporter out of the room and his recorder in the room, that one is questionable. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The plot thickens.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
