Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The reality of a minimum wage
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="YukonGlocker" data-source="post: 3004478" data-attributes="member: 425"><p>Which part?...their exclusion of 40% of the workforce, the fact that the labor market was changing at the same time the minimum wage was changes (and they didn't account for this in their analyses), or something else? Do you still trust the study knowing that they purposely did *not* include 40% of the workforce (and it being a specific sector of the workforce)? The rebuttal shows several methodological/analytical problems, and it's no accident that those problems/biases are in the same politically-motivated direction. Also, the study has not undergone peer-review...it's simply an opinion piece posted on the internet (and I know how much you adore those!). I'm genuinely interested in what you, and everyone else here, thinks about the study given its problems that are highlighted in the rebuttal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="YukonGlocker, post: 3004478, member: 425"] Which part?...their exclusion of 40% of the workforce, the fact that the labor market was changing at the same time the minimum wage was changes (and they didn't account for this in their analyses), or something else? Do you still trust the study knowing that they purposely did *not* include 40% of the workforce (and it being a specific sector of the workforce)? The rebuttal shows several methodological/analytical problems, and it's no accident that those problems/biases are in the same politically-motivated direction. Also, the study has not undergone peer-review...it's simply an opinion piece posted on the internet (and I know how much you adore those!). I'm genuinely interested in what you, and everyone else here, thinks about the study given its problems that are highlighted in the rebuttal. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The reality of a minimum wage
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom