Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cjjtulsa" data-source="post: 3380420" data-attributes="member: 6146"><p>But isn&#039;t the whole &quot;social distancing&quot;, &quot;wear a mask&quot;, and other such measures meant to &quot;flatten the curve&quot; so that hospitals don&#039;t get overwhelmed?&nbsp; Are they anywhere near &quot;overwhelmed&quot;?&nbsp; No. And they never have been (outside of a few metro areas in other parts of the country).&nbsp; In the beginning of this fiasco, that was the whole intent and purpose. But somehow our nation of Nancies have morphed this into &quot;you have to wear a mask, or you want people to die&quot;, or some other such nonsense that they believe that the mask-wearing, social-distancing, avoiding crowds, etc. is going to STOP the virus from spreading.&nbsp; It won&#039;t, and it&#039;s going to have to run its course.&nbsp; The whole idea was to keep the hospitals in a state that they could treat the sick, and even with the rising numbers, our hospitals are in no way packed to the gills with COVID patients.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="cjjtulsa, post: 3380420, member: 6146"] But isn't the whole "social distancing", "wear a mask", and other such measures meant to "flatten the curve" so that hospitals don't get overwhelmed? Are they anywhere near "overwhelmed"? No. And they never have been (outside of a few metro areas in other parts of the country). In the beginning of this fiasco, that was the whole intent and purpose. But somehow our nation of Nancies have morphed this into "you have to wear a mask, or you want people to die", or some other such nonsense that they believe that the mask-wearing, social-distancing, avoiding crowds, etc. is going to STOP the virus from spreading. It won't, and it's going to have to run its course. The whole idea was to keep the hospitals in a state that they could treat the sick, and even with the rising numbers, our hospitals are in no way packed to the gills with COVID patients. [/QUOTE]

Verification