Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The Truth about GM
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="68mustang" data-source="post: 1875087" data-attributes="member: 9584"><p>I'm a little biased but, Ford has always been forward thinking. They saw the writing on the wall and prepared for bad times before the bailouts. That's why they took the least hit. Also, back in the 60s ford came out with a 427 cammer motor that would have destroyed nascar and did destroy the dragstrip. BUT chrysler bitched about it being an ohc motor and the motor was banned before even ONE race. Also, ford was designing the aod back in the 60s but didnt put it into production until mid 80s i believe. The cleveland style motors are along the same thinking of what the big three are building their motors around (small displacement/big heads), the reason they weren't successful was because the camshaft tech at the time wasn't advanced enough to use the "big" heads on the Cleveland efficiently. Ford jumped the gun on the OHC 4.6 motor (not enough displacment/head flow imo). But they are getting better and will eclipse the pushrod motors.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="68mustang, post: 1875087, member: 9584"] I'm a little biased but, Ford has always been forward thinking. They saw the writing on the wall and prepared for bad times before the bailouts. That's why they took the least hit. Also, back in the 60s ford came out with a 427 cammer motor that would have destroyed nascar and did destroy the dragstrip. BUT chrysler bitched about it being an ohc motor and the motor was banned before even ONE race. Also, ford was designing the aod back in the 60s but didnt put it into production until mid 80s i believe. The cleveland style motors are along the same thinking of what the big three are building their motors around (small displacement/big heads), the reason they weren't successful was because the camshaft tech at the time wasn't advanced enough to use the "big" heads on the Cleveland efficiently. Ford jumped the gun on the OHC 4.6 motor (not enough displacment/head flow imo). But they are getting better and will eclipse the pushrod motors. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The Truth about GM
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom