Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The TSA as we know it is dead
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="criticalbass" data-source="post: 2023381" data-attributes="member: 711"><p>TSA went very quickly from "thousands standing around" to "travellers suffering abuses."</p><p></p><p>We need screening, but there's gotta be a better way. Simply dumping TSA is like saying to terrorists "hit me if you see an opening."</p><p></p><p>TSA is a classic example of "if you want it bad, that's how you'll get it." An internal restructuring, lots of training, lots of weeding, and probably a meaningless name change would all help. Obviously TSA needs a big inspirational leader, which we certainly do not have at this point. (can't find an icon for chicken noises, but bwak-bwak-bwak!)</p><p></p><p>Congressional hearings are seldom a pleasant experience, but to duck one is suicidal behavior.</p><p></p><p>Giving security back to the FAA with enough money to support it (which they never had) is one maybe viable alternative. There is still some good talent there, and they could pick the good (and there is lots of good) in the TSA.</p><p></p><p>I have flown quite a bit since TSA came into the picture, and have never had the slightest problem with them, though some of the things they have done as reported in the media look pretty bad. That said, most of the reported problems are two-sided.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="criticalbass, post: 2023381, member: 711"] TSA went very quickly from "thousands standing around" to "travellers suffering abuses." We need screening, but there's gotta be a better way. Simply dumping TSA is like saying to terrorists "hit me if you see an opening." TSA is a classic example of "if you want it bad, that's how you'll get it." An internal restructuring, lots of training, lots of weeding, and probably a meaningless name change would all help. Obviously TSA needs a big inspirational leader, which we certainly do not have at this point. (can't find an icon for chicken noises, but bwak-bwak-bwak!) Congressional hearings are seldom a pleasant experience, but to duck one is suicidal behavior. Giving security back to the FAA with enough money to support it (which they never had) is one maybe viable alternative. There is still some good talent there, and they could pick the good (and there is lots of good) in the TSA. I have flown quite a bit since TSA came into the picture, and have never had the slightest problem with them, though some of the things they have done as reported in the media look pretty bad. That said, most of the reported problems are two-sided. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The TSA as we know it is dead
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom