Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The U.S. Will Never Change
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 1734219" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>So let me get this straight. We just went from "preventing Iran from getting the bomb" to some Iranian strapping a nuke they haven't even developed on and boarding a bus. I'm no expert on this issue, but i thought this nuclear stuff was pretty complex science, let alone the steps needed to make a nuke small enough to be strapped to a body in middle of NYC. Wouldn't a dirty bomb be much easier to build? In which case all they'd have to do is steal some nuclear materials, not refine them into weapons grade, which seems like something that any group could do. Not just Iran.</p><p></p><p>Replace Iran with the name of the enemy du jour and your statement justifies any type of war. </p><p></p><p>"(Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Israel, etc) is a known sponsor of that type of terrorism. Even if (Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Israel, etc) just had 1 nuke and somehow figured out a way to set it off in NY City or Los Angeles, how many Americans would die and be injured. Even if we launched 200 nukes in retaliation (yea, like Obama would even do that), the (Iraqis, Iranians, Syrians, Pakistanis, Israelis, etc) might just look at it like any other suicide mission they embark on."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 1734219, member: 277"] So let me get this straight. We just went from "preventing Iran from getting the bomb" to some Iranian strapping a nuke they haven't even developed on and boarding a bus. I'm no expert on this issue, but i thought this nuclear stuff was pretty complex science, let alone the steps needed to make a nuke small enough to be strapped to a body in middle of NYC. Wouldn't a dirty bomb be much easier to build? In which case all they'd have to do is steal some nuclear materials, not refine them into weapons grade, which seems like something that any group could do. Not just Iran. Replace Iran with the name of the enemy du jour and your statement justifies any type of war. "(Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Israel, etc) is a known sponsor of that type of terrorism. Even if (Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Israel, etc) just had 1 nuke and somehow figured out a way to set it off in NY City or Los Angeles, how many Americans would die and be injured. Even if we launched 200 nukes in retaliation (yea, like Obama would even do that), the (Iraqis, Iranians, Syrians, Pakistanis, Israelis, etc) might just look at it like any other suicide mission they embark on." [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
The U.S. Will Never Change
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
