Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The Useful Illogic of 'Assault Weapon' Bans
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gerhard1" data-source="post: 2887022" data-attributes="member: 5391"><p>One thing I notice is that the liberals use any excuse that they can to nibble away at our rights. They acknowledge that in the last two mass shootings, and others, that no-fly lists or terror watch-lists would have nothing to prevent them, yet they use them to promote proposals which they (the liberals) admit they would not have prevented. </p><p></p><p>In both San Bernardino and Orlando, the killers bought their weapons legally, passing background checks and as far as I know, neither was on either a terror watch list or a no-fly list, so to use either of these incidents as a reason to pass laws preventing people on these lists from buying guns is akin to arguing for the banning of alcohol because someone OD'd on heroin. It is illogical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gerhard1, post: 2887022, member: 5391"] One thing I notice is that the liberals use any excuse that they can to nibble away at our rights. They acknowledge that in the last two mass shootings, and others, that no-fly lists or terror watch-lists would have nothing to prevent them, yet they use them to promote proposals which they (the liberals) admit they would not have prevented. In both San Bernardino and Orlando, the killers bought their weapons legally, passing background checks and as far as I know, neither was on either a terror watch list or a no-fly list, so to use either of these incidents as a reason to pass laws preventing people on these lists from buying guns is akin to arguing for the banning of alcohol because someone OD'd on heroin. It is illogical. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The Useful Illogic of 'Assault Weapon' Bans
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom