Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bigb159" data-source="post: 4218637" data-attributes="member: 51595">As usual, all the coomers show up to defend their right to degeneracy. Honestly, what's the point, gents? No one cares about your porn needs, and no one wants to stop your ******* alone in the dark. Just leave the kids out of it."I found dad's tiddy mags when I was twelve, hur hur" is not the strong argument you seem to think it is. Simply because your parents and society failed to protect you, doesn't mean we have to subject all children to early loss of innocence. Honestly, "let boys see ****" is some ****-level thinking. The physical world reality is that X-Rated merchandise and advertising gets hidden from kids, or you lose your business license. Society demands that if you sell adult items like alcohol, weapons, vehicles or sex, you don't do it to kids, whether they are your kids or not. Pornographers will sell their own and others' bodies and souls for an extra buck. They don't care who it is, or what age they are - this is the purest form of libertarianism some dream about. Online, creating an addict is easy pickings; they eagerly and actively create funnels to drive people from spam and ads, all the paid to their paid memberships, and from the comfort of the addict's home. Parents have next to zero protections against these malicious ads, except banning all devices from their homes, which today is near impossible to do. You have to be a technologist to implement functional porn restrictions in your home, and those even fail to filter basic image searches. Parents need better tools, and porn should not be three letters and the enter key away.Until then, standard age verification to access pornography, much like in a physical store, seems a reasonable ask. Yes, the risks should fall squarely on your shoulders, not kids'.</blockquote>

Verification