Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chuckie" data-source="post: 4039805" data-attributes="member: 42584">More than &#039;snacks&#039; being stolen it seems!&nbsp; Just learned that 30 tons of Ammonium Nitrate (remember the OKC bombing?) has gone missing from a rail shipment somewhere between Wyoming and California-NTM.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/21/us/chemical-missing-shipment-california-wyoming.html" target="_blank">30 Tons of Explosive Chemicals Lost During Rail Shipment</a>ADDENDUM:&nbsp; I would tend to believe that a 30-ton loss of chemicals from rail car(s) over about 800 miles (Cheyenne WY - [probably] Barstow CA) would not go unnoticed because of monitoring (electronic, scale weight difference, or visual) especially when freight trains routinely have to make several stops because of the distances involved for things like inspections, crew change, and legally mandated rest-outs (similar to OTR truckers). This was no &#039;accidental loss&#039; as the media wants everyone to believe.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chuckie, post: 4039805, member: 42584"] More than 'snacks' being stolen it seems! Just learned that 30 [B]tons[/B] of Ammonium Nitrate (remember the OKC bombing?) has gone missing from a rail shipment somewhere between Wyoming and California-NTM. [URL='https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/21/us/chemical-missing-shipment-california-wyoming.html']30 Tons of Explosive Chemicals Lost During Rail Shipment[/URL] ADDENDUM: I would tend to believe that a 30-ton loss of chemicals from rail car(s) over about 800 miles (Cheyenne WY - [probably] Barstow CA) would not go unnoticed because of monitoring (electronic, scale weight difference, or visual) especially when freight trains routinely have to make several stops because of the distances involved for things like inspections, crew change, and legally mandated rest-outs (similar to OTR truckers). This was no 'accidental loss' as the media wants everyone to believe. [/QUOTE]

Verification