Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This doesn't fit very well with the human induced Global Warming Theory
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 2997305" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>So...how does Google's bias affect the radius of the earth? Does it make the reported number bigger or smaller? Or does it just affect the conversion from miles to inches?</p><p></p><p>Oh, I know, it chooses <em>which</em> NASA report to give; a different search engine--one with a conservative bias--would give us the NASA report that says the shift was 100 miles instead of 6.5", right?</p><p></p><p>Seriously, if you're okay being off by a factor of a million because you're too damned lazy to do thirty seconds' worth of research--and then dismiss verifiable numerical facts not really subject to interpretation as "biased," well, I think that tells us all everything we need to know about your credibility.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 2997305, member: 13624"] So...how does Google's bias affect the radius of the earth? Does it make the reported number bigger or smaller? Or does it just affect the conversion from miles to inches? Oh, I know, it chooses [I]which[/I] NASA report to give; a different search engine--one with a conservative bias--would give us the NASA report that says the shift was 100 miles instead of 6.5", right? Seriously, if you're okay being off by a factor of a million because you're too damned lazy to do thirty seconds' worth of research--and then dismiss verifiable numerical facts not really subject to interpretation as "biased," well, I think that tells us all everything we need to know about your credibility. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This doesn't fit very well with the human induced Global Warming Theory
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
