Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This doesn't fit very well with the human induced Global Warming Theory
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 2997338" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>1) You choose "remcall" a figure, even when you could find an accurate number in about thirty seconds with tools <em>already at your fingertips</em></p><p>2) You use that figure to support an argument; moreover, an argument that has its grounding in science, which is all about verifying or disproving facts</p><p>3) You get called on your bull, with some very simple math that shows you off by a factor of <em>a million times</em></p><p>4) Rather than admit your error, you say "hurr-durr, your facts are biased!"</p><p>5) You get butthurt when challenged on your claim of bias, claiming your laziness justifies your wrongness</p><p>6) You double down by slinging an <em>ad hominem</em> attack rather than addressing the factual issue</p><p></p><p>Yeah, I'm okay with condemning you and considering these facts as I assess your (total lack of) credibility in anything you say in the future. Also, I'm not that kind of lawyer, but, again, facts obviously mean nothing to you; you've made your decisions, and by-gawd, you're going to stick to them, facts be damned!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 2997338, member: 13624"] 1) You choose "remcall" a figure, even when you could find an accurate number in about thirty seconds with tools [I]already at your fingertips[/I] 2) You use that figure to support an argument; moreover, an argument that has its grounding in science, which is all about verifying or disproving facts 3) You get called on your bull, with some very simple math that shows you off by a factor of [I]a million times[/I] 4) Rather than admit your error, you say "hurr-durr, your facts are biased!" 5) You get butthurt when challenged on your claim of bias, claiming your laziness justifies your wrongness 6) You double down by slinging an [I]ad hominem[/I] attack rather than addressing the factual issue Yeah, I'm okay with condemning you and considering these facts as I assess your (total lack of) credibility in anything you say in the future. Also, I'm not that kind of lawyer, but, again, facts obviously mean nothing to you; you've made your decisions, and by-gawd, you're going to stick to them, facts be damned! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This doesn't fit very well with the human induced Global Warming Theory
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom