Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
This is Another Reason to End Qualified Immunity
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 4053627" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>The current problem is that the bad apples never feel the pain. They keep violating constitutional rights, the union keeps defending them and the agency's governing body just pays the civil suit settlements and judgements.</p><p></p><p>At some point, an individual LEO who is the constitutional equivalent of a bull in a china closet, should be considered a "high risk" and be required to pay their own liability insurance. If they reach the point they're considered "uninsurable", then they should have their qualified immunity revoked and be held personally liable for any and all violations. Look at it as a liability equivalent to Giglio Impairment. </p><p></p><p>So I don't think every LEO should be required to self-insure, but the ones who cause the most chaos definitely should.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 4053627, member: 1132"] The current problem is that the bad apples never feel the pain. They keep violating constitutional rights, the union keeps defending them and the agency's governing body just pays the civil suit settlements and judgements. At some point, an individual LEO who is the constitutional equivalent of a bull in a china closet, should be considered a "high risk" and be required to pay their own liability insurance. If they reach the point they're considered "uninsurable", then they should have their qualified immunity revoked and be held personally liable for any and all violations. Look at it as a liability equivalent to Giglio Impairment. So I don't think every LEO should be required to self-insure, but the ones who cause the most chaos definitely should. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
This is Another Reason to End Qualified Immunity
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
