Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This Is What Will Happen If ‘Greatest Voter Fraud Operation Ever Biden’ Becomes POTUS
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 3477365" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>The Chief Justice in Wisconsin Patience Drake Roggensack has came out with the dissent of the ruling in that state. </p><p>Short version:</p><p>"a significant portion of the public does not believe that the Nov 3, 2020 presidential election was fairly conducted. Once again, four justices on this court cannot be bothered with addressing what the statutes require to assure that absentee ballots are lawfully cast. Four members of this court throw the cloak of laches over numerous problems that will be repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to correct them".</p><p>Another dissenting SC judge, Annette Kingsland Ziegler said, "Every single voter in this state is harmed when a vote is cast in contravention of the statutes. Doomed to create chaos, uncertainty, undermine confidence and spawn needless litigation. This is not the rule of law, it is the rule of judicial activism through inaction."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 3477365, member: 5412"] The Chief Justice in Wisconsin Patience Drake Roggensack has came out with the dissent of the ruling in that state. Short version: "a significant portion of the public does not believe that the Nov 3, 2020 presidential election was fairly conducted. Once again, four justices on this court cannot be bothered with addressing what the statutes require to assure that absentee ballots are lawfully cast. Four members of this court throw the cloak of laches over numerous problems that will be repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to correct them". Another dissenting SC judge, Annette Kingsland Ziegler said, "Every single voter in this state is harmed when a vote is cast in contravention of the statutes. Doomed to create chaos, uncertainty, undermine confidence and spawn needless litigation. This is not the rule of law, it is the rule of judicial activism through inaction." [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This Is What Will Happen If ‘Greatest Voter Fraud Operation Ever Biden’ Becomes POTUS
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom