Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
This side-effect of the gay marriage ruling will make liberals EXPLODE
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 2764091" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Don't be too quick to jump on the band wagon.</p><p></p><p>Beware of the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling. It has a nasty pig in its poke. In that ruling, the Court claimed that the Constitution granted a right(Pg. 28). If the Court gets away with this, it can be claimed that the RKBA is granted by the Constitution and then all it would take to eliminate the right would be to eliminate the Second Amendment.</p><p></p><p> As it stands right now, the Second Amendment protects the right. If the Second Amendment goes away, we still would have the right regardless of whether it is protected in the Constitution or not. (Note: The Ninth Amendment would still indirectly protect the right.)</p><p></p><p> Repeating for effect, if it becomes accepted that the right is granted by the Constitution, the right itself can be considered non-existent in the eyes of the law if the Second Amendment is repealed.</p><p></p><p> I hope more people than me have seen this little precedent-setting usurpation. I can't believe this is a synesis or a trope. I believe it is on purpose.</p><p></p><p> Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 2764091, member: 745"] Don't be too quick to jump on the band wagon. Beware of the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling. It has a nasty pig in its poke. In that ruling, the Court claimed that the Constitution granted a right(Pg. 28). If the Court gets away with this, it can be claimed that the RKBA is granted by the Constitution and then all it would take to eliminate the right would be to eliminate the Second Amendment. As it stands right now, the Second Amendment protects the right. If the Second Amendment goes away, we still would have the right regardless of whether it is protected in the Constitution or not. (Note: The Ninth Amendment would still indirectly protect the right.) Repeating for effect, if it becomes accepted that the right is granted by the Constitution, the right itself can be considered non-existent in the eyes of the law if the Second Amendment is repealed. I hope more people than me have seen this little precedent-setting usurpation. I can't believe this is a synesis or a trope. I believe it is on purpose. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
This side-effect of the gay marriage ruling will make liberals EXPLODE
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
