Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Thoughts on the 2nd Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sh00ter" data-source="post: 2028846" data-attributes="member: 24531"><p>I supported Assad, Gadhaffi and Mubarkak...totalitarian, socialist dictators do a GREAT job at keeping radical muslims in line (the Shaw did this in Iran before the revolution)...We always go in and arm the people who hate us and help them rise to power...Obongo approved 20 F-16's to go to the Muslim Brotherhood...he wants to TAKE your AR15, but give F-16's to a radical theocractic gov't who hates America...I do get your point, but in this case, the dictators are the lesser of two evils when it comes to radical Islam. I don't actually "support" the fore mentioned dictators, but they were what was best for us. I think we should stay out of it (like say Syria) because BOTH sides are bad ultimately. </p><p></p><p>The Russian media made a mockery of us after the Benghazi incident...they basically said we don't learn our lesson...always propping up Islamists and then all surprised when they turn on us. Gadhaffi was a former terr0r supporter and had American blood on his hands...but the "here & now" his existence was good for the USA.</p><p></p><p>MOVING the topic off of radical Islam, then I totally agree...Stalin, Hitler, Mao all disarmed people...tyrannical regimes LOVE un-armed peasants.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sh00ter, post: 2028846, member: 24531"] I supported Assad, Gadhaffi and Mubarkak...totalitarian, socialist dictators do a GREAT job at keeping radical muslims in line (the Shaw did this in Iran before the revolution)...We always go in and arm the people who hate us and help them rise to power...Obongo approved 20 F-16's to go to the Muslim Brotherhood...he wants to TAKE your AR15, but give F-16's to a radical theocractic gov't who hates America...I do get your point, but in this case, the dictators are the lesser of two evils when it comes to radical Islam. I don't actually "support" the fore mentioned dictators, but they were what was best for us. I think we should stay out of it (like say Syria) because BOTH sides are bad ultimately. The Russian media made a mockery of us after the Benghazi incident...they basically said we don't learn our lesson...always propping up Islamists and then all surprised when they turn on us. Gadhaffi was a former terr0r supporter and had American blood on his hands...but the "here & now" his existence was good for the USA. MOVING the topic off of radical Islam, then I totally agree...Stalin, Hitler, Mao all disarmed people...tyrannical regimes LOVE un-armed peasants. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Thoughts on the 2nd Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom