Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Billybob" data-source="post: 3153777" data-attributes="member: 1294">Did you read my post#74? A question arises as to whether the completion of the rest of the park will be paid by the gathering place because that has not been specifically stated. Or could the following phase possibly be wrangled around to be considered capital improvements to the existing park? It's already been stated TPS bond money is going to be used so who's to say more taxpayer funds will not be used.And again $65mil. in tax dollars went into making the park possible and they want free water utilities like a public park would have, that along with the capital improvements issue seems to show tax dollars are involved so why can't we get away from the outright lie about it all being a free gift and not costing the public anything? But again as I said before that lie helps cover the fact that tax money has went into a project the voters specifically turned down, have to wonder if some might construe that as taxation without representation.</blockquote>