Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Time to Call Coburns Office, he's lost his mind
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 2120629" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>Thank you for calling Coburn. We all need to be doing that. </p><p>One thing to tell Coburn's aides is that the lefties will provide a <strong>narrow definition of what registration is,</strong> and then create all sorts of <strong>gun safety databases</strong>, all the while claiming it is NOT REGISTRATION. </p><p><u>For example, </u>the lefties can claim that registration is defined as a "<em>federal level database that ties gun owners to their firearms.</em>" </p><p>Then, they can issue policy directives that mandate that a<em>ll sellers maintain records of sales and produce them on demand</em>. This is <strong>not a federal level database and hence is not registration the way they define i</strong>t. </p><p>and this can go on.....</p><p>In a year or so we will have registration, while they will keep saying " We are against registration, but....."</p><p>Just like they are saying "We are for 2A, but......."</p><p></p><p>see the article below for what is going on right now:</p><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/25/obama-gun-control_n_2761488.html?" target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/25/obama-gun-control_n_2761488.html?</a></p><p><img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 2120629, member: 3553"] Thank you for calling Coburn. We all need to be doing that. One thing to tell Coburn's aides is that the lefties will provide a [B]narrow definition of what registration is,[/B] and then create all sorts of [B]gun safety databases[/B], all the while claiming it is NOT REGISTRATION. [U]For example, [/U]the lefties can claim that registration is defined as a "[I]federal level database that ties gun owners to their firearms.[/I]" Then, they can issue policy directives that mandate that a[I]ll sellers maintain records of sales and produce them on demand[/I]. This is [B]not a federal level database and hence is not registration the way they define i[/B]t. and this can go on..... In a year or so we will have registration, while they will keep saying " We are against registration, but....." Just like they are saying "We are for 2A, but......." see the article below for what is going on right now: [url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/25/obama-gun-control_n_2761488.html?[/url] :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Time to Call Coburns Office, he's lost his mind
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
