Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Time to retire some old manuals.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EKing" data-source="post: 3970459" data-attributes="member: 43282"><p>Hang onto those manuals. </p><p>I've found that when looking for a load I will reference every source of load data I have. For some powder/bullet combos there have been some interesting differences among the data. When that happens I will gather as much data as possible and make a decision that falls somewhere in the middle of it all, with some deference to the bullet manufacturer.</p><p></p><p>We also must reconcile that powder companies don't make bullets and bullet companies don't make powder. Yet both of them produce load data. Who is right? If Hornady says something about their bullet and a particular powder, I give that a lot of weight. Lyman has a lot of info on cast bullets and even includes info on many Hornady bullets. They've been doing this for a long time and I trust their data.</p><p></p><p>I don't subscribe to the idea that companies are publishing "weak" or "conservative" data in order to avoid possible lawsuits. There are too many instances where a too light load is actually just as dangerous as a too hot load. Think H110 powder. It is important for them to get it right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EKing, post: 3970459, member: 43282"] Hang onto those manuals. I've found that when looking for a load I will reference every source of load data I have. For some powder/bullet combos there have been some interesting differences among the data. When that happens I will gather as much data as possible and make a decision that falls somewhere in the middle of it all, with some deference to the bullet manufacturer. We also must reconcile that powder companies don't make bullets and bullet companies don't make powder. Yet both of them produce load data. Who is right? If Hornady says something about their bullet and a particular powder, I give that a lot of weight. Lyman has a lot of info on cast bullets and even includes info on many Hornady bullets. They've been doing this for a long time and I trust their data. I don't subscribe to the idea that companies are publishing "weak" or "conservative" data in order to avoid possible lawsuits. There are too many instances where a too light load is actually just as dangerous as a too hot load. Think H110 powder. It is important for them to get it right. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Time to retire some old manuals.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom