Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
To port or not to port??
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kid Glock" data-source="post: 723483" data-attributes="member: 189"><p>I understand the theory but personally I don't see the need in a handgun. </p><p>Although I always use hearing protection when on the range, the trade off (sound v recoil) isn't worth it to me. Plus, .357 recoil isn't that punishing imo.</p><p>The only thing I don't like about my S&W 500 is the comp and IL. On it, a solid 4" barrel and no lock would be ideal.</p><p>Even on long guns, it's not desirable to me until you get into the magnum</p><p>.30's to .50 BMG class.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kid Glock, post: 723483, member: 189"] I understand the theory but personally I don't see the need in a handgun. Although I always use hearing protection when on the range, the trade off (sound v recoil) isn't worth it to me. Plus, .357 recoil isn't that punishing imo. The only thing I don't like about my S&W 500 is the comp and IL. On it, a solid 4" barrel and no lock would be ideal. Even on long guns, it's not desirable to me until you get into the magnum .30's to .50 BMG class. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
To port or not to port??
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom