Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
TPD Investigation over Community Event
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HMFIC" data-source="post: 1468597" data-attributes="member: 7539"><p>Good points and I do agree with everything save for understanding the Capt.'s perspective.</p><p></p><p>I believe (and this is after reading his memo also) that a significant portion of his complaint was being forced to force his subordinates also. Were it his own personal beliefs, perhaps it might not have reached this point, but I do understand the concept of not forcing your subordinates to do something that you personally are not comfortable with. Also, if he honestly believes that it was a violation of his civil rights, he would be opening himself up to being a party of violating theirs as well. He not only sought legal counsel on the matter ahead of time, he also followed through on this with his lawsuit against the chief, so he's walking the walk.</p><p></p><p>I guess we'll see if a judge agrees or not...</p><p></p><p>Either way, again I do agree it's a sticky point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HMFIC, post: 1468597, member: 7539"] Good points and I do agree with everything save for understanding the Capt.'s perspective. I believe (and this is after reading his memo also) that a significant portion of his complaint was being forced to force his subordinates also. Were it his own personal beliefs, perhaps it might not have reached this point, but I do understand the concept of not forcing your subordinates to do something that you personally are not comfortable with. Also, if he honestly believes that it was a violation of his civil rights, he would be opening himself up to being a party of violating theirs as well. He not only sought legal counsel on the matter ahead of time, he also followed through on this with his lawsuit against the chief, so he's walking the walk. I guess we'll see if a judge agrees or not... Either way, again I do agree it's a sticky point. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
TPD Investigation over Community Event
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom