Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Tuesday's vote - Dist Judge (Dist. 7 Office 7)
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 1338134" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>All I see coming from Wes Lane is innuendo. He presents no facts to back up his claim of a character flaw in Cindy Truong. </p><p></p><p>I've met Cindy Truong, spoken with her, listened to her speak in public, observed her demeanor interacting with people in a gathering, and though limited as judicial candidates are when it comes to campaigning, I observed no flaws. I may be wrong, but I don't believe she is even allowed to defend herself from such innuendo. </p><p></p><p>I've also met with Wes Lane on other than political or judicial matters and I find him likable, and voted for him to become DA when I lived in Oklahoma County. That said, he needs to speak up with the facts and not do a dirty dance he hopes will cast dispersions on the character of another human being. At the least he owes that to the people of Oklahoma County that they might make an informed decision. </p><p></p><p>I remain in high regard of Cindy Truong, and have diminished regard for Wes Lane. </p><p></p><p>Please know that I cannot vote in Oklahoma County as I live in Logan County. I speak up only because I've interacted with Cindy Truong and Wes Lane and I see a disparity in forthrightness. </p><p></p><p>I've never met Pat Crawley.</p><p></p><p>Seek out the truth before you cast your vote.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 1338134, member: 745"] All I see coming from Wes Lane is innuendo. He presents no facts to back up his claim of a character flaw in Cindy Truong. I've met Cindy Truong, spoken with her, listened to her speak in public, observed her demeanor interacting with people in a gathering, and though limited as judicial candidates are when it comes to campaigning, I observed no flaws. I may be wrong, but I don't believe she is even allowed to defend herself from such innuendo. I've also met with Wes Lane on other than political or judicial matters and I find him likable, and voted for him to become DA when I lived in Oklahoma County. That said, he needs to speak up with the facts and not do a dirty dance he hopes will cast dispersions on the character of another human being. At the least he owes that to the people of Oklahoma County that they might make an informed decision. I remain in high regard of Cindy Truong, and have diminished regard for Wes Lane. Please know that I cannot vote in Oklahoma County as I live in Logan County. I speak up only because I've interacted with Cindy Truong and Wes Lane and I see a disparity in forthrightness. I've never met Pat Crawley. Seek out the truth before you cast your vote. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Tuesday's vote - Dist Judge (Dist. 7 Office 7)
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom