Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 4148980" data-attributes="member: 7900">That version of The Quick and the Dead stars Sam Elliott.&nbsp; It is a heck of a lot more believable than that other &quot;quick and dead.&quot;I think the only Louis L&#039;Amour movie that &quot;kind of sucked&quot; for me was one entitled &quot;A Man Called Noon.&quot;&nbsp; While it sort of followed the book somewhat, the actions in the movie was distracting and disjointed.&nbsp; One of those where Richard Crenna shoots a six shooter well over six times without reloading and or maybe seeing the same horse and rider fall multiple times.&nbsp; (OK, the horse and rider thing might have not happened, but some of the other scenes seemed far-fetched.)I had a hard drive crash some time back and lost my list of DVD&#039;s owned.&nbsp; Now, I guess I get to go back through them and redo the list.But yeah, just about anything with John Wayne is a go to for me.&nbsp; I can get a better list after I get my owned list created again.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 4148980, member: 7900"] That version of The Quick and the Dead stars Sam Elliott. It is a heck of a lot more believable than that other "quick and dead." I think the only Louis L'Amour movie that "kind of sucked" for me was one entitled "A Man Called Noon." While it sort of followed the book somewhat, the actions in the movie was distracting and disjointed. One of those where Richard Crenna shoots a six shooter well over six times without reloading and or maybe seeing the same horse and rider fall multiple times. (OK, the horse and rider thing might have not happened, but some of the other scenes seemed far-fetched.) I had a hard drive crash some time back and lost my list of DVD's owned. Now, I guess I get to go back through them and redo the list. But yeah, just about anything with John Wayne is a go to for me. I can get a better list after I get my owned list created again. [/QUOTE]

Verification