Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
U.S. House Passes NRA-backed National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Legislation
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 1661603" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>there are plenty of federal laws that restrict the RKBA that could be regarded as unconstitutional. I fail to see why the one Bill that actually makes it easier to conceal carry should become the bill we all pick on; let's accept the reality that the federal government has already meddled in the RKBA way way way beyond what they should have according to the Constitution. I don't think this particular bill goes beyond what they have already done. It seems to only make it easier for CCwers to carry across state lines. </p><p>Perhaps those who are against this should also question the other federal intrusions that already exist, do nothing to make it easier to keep or bear arms, and are already established law. To sum up, this bill is not doing any further damage than has already been done and has lots of benefit to CCWers. hence I support it, but as I said before I am not holding my breath that it will ever pass. </p><p></p><p>here's a crazy idea: maybe we need a constitutional amendment that unambiguously says the right to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED...u know.. to make all these intrusions that have already taken place since 1928 unconstitutional. </p><p></p><p><img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 1661603, member: 3553"] there are plenty of federal laws that restrict the RKBA that could be regarded as unconstitutional. I fail to see why the one Bill that actually makes it easier to conceal carry should become the bill we all pick on; let's accept the reality that the federal government has already meddled in the RKBA way way way beyond what they should have according to the Constitution. I don't think this particular bill goes beyond what they have already done. It seems to only make it easier for CCwers to carry across state lines. Perhaps those who are against this should also question the other federal intrusions that already exist, do nothing to make it easier to keep or bear arms, and are already established law. To sum up, this bill is not doing any further damage than has already been done and has lots of benefit to CCWers. hence I support it, but as I said before I am not holding my breath that it will ever pass. here's a crazy idea: maybe we need a constitutional amendment that unambiguously says the right to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED...u know.. to make all these intrusions that have already taken place since 1928 unconstitutional. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
U.S. House Passes NRA-backed National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Legislation
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom