Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
UN Gun Ban Treaty
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="6 Strings" data-source="post: 2780216" data-attributes="member: 38393"><p>Let’s add “genius” to the moniker of the angry troll who chronically apologizes for Obama and his merry band of incompetents. </p><p></p><p>To point, if the treaty is ratified it is binding. </p><p></p><p>“Both the administration and Congress should formally state that the ATT is simply a treaty, that it is binding only on nations that have ratified it, that it is not customary international law, and that its entry into force has no implications for the U.S.,” he said in a recent issue brief.</p><p></p><p>Source? From Ted Bromund off the link that the “genius” angry troll posted! </p><p></p><p>Lesson &#8230; If you parse posts you are disingenuous and if you don’t read (or understand) the citation you post &#8230; you are a moron.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="6 Strings, post: 2780216, member: 38393"] Let’s add “genius” to the moniker of the angry troll who chronically apologizes for Obama and his merry band of incompetents. To point, if the treaty is ratified it is binding. “Both the administration and Congress should formally state that the ATT is simply a treaty, that it is binding only on nations that have ratified it, that it is not customary international law, and that its entry into force has no implications for the U.S.,” he said in a recent issue brief. Source? From Ted Bromund off the link that the “genius” angry troll posted! Lesson … If you parse posts you are disingenuous and if you don’t read (or understand) the citation you post … you are a moron. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
UN Gun Ban Treaty
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom