Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Unconstitutional but for the better good?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="amcardon" data-source="post: 2659368" data-attributes="member: 26766"><p>That is the point! When enough people choose to be retarded they give the gov a reason to come in and have to do things like check points. You're upset at the gov's attempted solution to a legitimate problem. Don't be pissed at an attempted solution, be pissed at the problem. You think they'd have these checkpoints if they weren't productive? You want checkpoints to stop, figure out a way to make it so they don't have a reason to have them anymore. </p><p></p><p>That being said, I absolutely agree that gov over steps its bounds far too frequently, but that's typically fed not local (in my experience/opinion).</p><p></p><p>To the earlier post about swat kicking in doors, if the same percentage of homes were selling drugs as are DUI, then yes they should be kicking in doors because that's a sign that as a society we're pretty messed up. That was an "apples and oranges" comparison. </p><p></p><p>Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="amcardon, post: 2659368, member: 26766"] That is the point! When enough people choose to be retarded they give the gov a reason to come in and have to do things like check points. You're upset at the gov's attempted solution to a legitimate problem. Don't be pissed at an attempted solution, be pissed at the problem. You think they'd have these checkpoints if they weren't productive? You want checkpoints to stop, figure out a way to make it so they don't have a reason to have them anymore. That being said, I absolutely agree that gov over steps its bounds far too frequently, but that's typically fed not local (in my experience/opinion). To the earlier post about swat kicking in doors, if the same percentage of homes were selling drugs as are DUI, then yes they should be kicking in doors because that's a sign that as a society we're pretty messed up. That was an "apples and oranges" comparison. Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Unconstitutional but for the better good?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom