Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
University of Texas Shooting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tRidiot" data-source="post: 1302226" data-attributes="member: 9374"><p>I don't really see the point you're making here...</p><p></p><p>The shooter in that case was in an elevated and semi-protected position, with military training and tactical surprise and advantage.</p><p></p><p>So does the fact that he was unsuccessfully engaged by counter-fire mean it's useless in general to try to keep oneself safe in the future?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tRidiot, post: 1302226, member: 9374"] I don't really see the point you're making here... The shooter in that case was in an elevated and semi-protected position, with military training and tactical surprise and advantage. So does the fact that he was unsuccessfully engaged by counter-fire mean it's useless in general to try to keep oneself safe in the future? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
University of Texas Shooting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
