Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Unlike Sen. Coburn, SAF/CCRKBA seems to have ACTUALLY sold out
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 2167274" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>From what I'm seeing here and in other sources, it looks like SAF has managed to get some pro-gun points added (I've seen national CCW reciprocity mentioned elsewhere), and apparently thinks that if passage of the anti-gun bits is inevitable, the trade-off is more than fair in the balance. I'm not saying I agree--that's how we got the NFA registry closed with FOPA '86--but it's not a <em>complete</em> sellout position so much as a pragmatic "at least get something in exchange for our losses" position.</p><p></p><p>My concern with that strategy is that it makes it more likely that House members who would join us in opposing the bill may now find it more acceptable on the grounds that it gives us something in exchange for our losses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 2167274, member: 13624"] From what I'm seeing here and in other sources, it looks like SAF has managed to get some pro-gun points added (I've seen national CCW reciprocity mentioned elsewhere), and apparently thinks that if passage of the anti-gun bits is inevitable, the trade-off is more than fair in the balance. I'm not saying I agree--that's how we got the NFA registry closed with FOPA '86--but it's not a [I]complete[/I] sellout position so much as a pragmatic "at least get something in exchange for our losses" position. My concern with that strategy is that it makes it more likely that House members who would join us in opposing the bill may now find it more acceptable on the grounds that it gives us something in exchange for our losses. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Unlike Sen. Coburn, SAF/CCRKBA seems to have ACTUALLY sold out
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
