Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US preparing to launch cruise missile attack on Syria
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2278918" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>I don't think you understood my synopsis. It isn't a direct invasion from Syrian forces, but a significant increase in arms shipments that will be more dispered than the current supply is. There will be a huge influx of arms to Hizballah and the Salfists fighting in Syria would import arms AND expertise to Hamas that it currently isn't getting. Faced with that reality, Israel would have to move to secure the Syrian border in depth, which it can ill afford. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you're mistaking what it takes to fire on Syria. All it takes is ignorance and arrogance, which he has in spades. Without so much as a how do you do, it seems we've slipped back in time and are now experiencing The Cold War v2.0. This is the closest we've come to a hot war with Russia since Able Archer in 1983. The problem with that is Reagan actually has some depth to his team regarding foreign affairs. Obama's foreign policy team couldn't outsmart a Nigerian scam artist. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2278918, member: 1132"] I don't think you understood my synopsis. It isn't a direct invasion from Syrian forces, but a significant increase in arms shipments that will be more dispered than the current supply is. There will be a huge influx of arms to Hizballah and the Salfists fighting in Syria would import arms AND expertise to Hamas that it currently isn't getting. Faced with that reality, Israel would have to move to secure the Syrian border in depth, which it can ill afford. I think you're mistaking what it takes to fire on Syria. All it takes is ignorance and arrogance, which he has in spades. Without so much as a how do you do, it seems we've slipped back in time and are now experiencing The Cold War v2.0. This is the closest we've come to a hot war with Russia since Able Archer in 1983. The problem with that is Reagan actually has some depth to his team regarding foreign affairs. Obama's foreign policy team couldn't outsmart a Nigerian scam artist. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US preparing to launch cruise missile attack on Syria
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom