Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 3469986" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>Courts have historically not wanted to get involved in what they view as political issues. However when you're alleging things like illegally counting votes or other things that are a matter of established laws then the courts do have a history of involvement (otherwise why is the trump campaign even bothering). </p><p></p><p>As a matter of establishing those laws, though, that has always been an area where state legislatures have set the rules.</p><p></p><p>An example of this was the challenge in PA where the court said that the officials couldn't extend the deadline for late ballots since it was set by the legislature. </p><p></p><p>Has there ever been an example of a legislature going back after the people voted (using the prescribed method as set-forth by law) and changing electors from those it said it would send to represent the person who one said vote?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 3469986, member: 277"] Courts have historically not wanted to get involved in what they view as political issues. However when you're alleging things like illegally counting votes or other things that are a matter of established laws then the courts do have a history of involvement (otherwise why is the trump campaign even bothering). As a matter of establishing those laws, though, that has always been an area where state legislatures have set the rules. An example of this was the challenge in PA where the court said that the officials couldn't extend the deadline for late ballots since it was set by the legislature. Has there ever been an example of a legislature going back after the people voted (using the prescribed method as set-forth by law) and changing electors from those it said it would send to represent the person who one said vote? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom