Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 3469997" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>Accusations are not proof, at least according to several judges who have already reviewed 'witness' affidavits in this matter.</p><p></p><p>There are several examples out there where a judge has heard from someone who 'saw' something, yet dismissed the case because the defense also provided affidavits as a counterpoint. The judge who ruled about the person who said they saw out of state tags delivering ballots is a great example. The defense showed that while the person's sworn testimony was true, it lacked an understanding of the situation because the person didn't know that the election officials had rented a truck to carry the legal ballots and that it had out of state tags.</p><p></p><p>Or another judge who ruled that the witness, who had skipped watcher orientation, didn't have a complete understanding of the process they saw because they hadn't gone through the training.</p><p></p><p>What the lawmakers are being told might well be evidence or it might well be half the story.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 3469997, member: 277"] Accusations are not proof, at least according to several judges who have already reviewed 'witness' affidavits in this matter. There are several examples out there where a judge has heard from someone who 'saw' something, yet dismissed the case because the defense also provided affidavits as a counterpoint. The judge who ruled about the person who said they saw out of state tags delivering ballots is a great example. The defense showed that while the person's sworn testimony was true, it lacked an understanding of the situation because the person didn't know that the election officials had rented a truck to carry the legal ballots and that it had out of state tags. Or another judge who ruled that the witness, who had skipped watcher orientation, didn't have a complete understanding of the process they saw because they hadn't gone through the training. What the lawmakers are being told might well be evidence or it might well be half the story. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom