Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 3473018" data-attributes="member: 277">that is a fine sentiment, but not entirely true. One dead person voting is wrong, but also would not have changed this (or almost any) election. That is both a practical fact and one the courts have continued to hold. The level of fraud must be demonstrably big enough to challenge the results. It's the same reason why the Trump campaign have stopped some legal challenges in places like AZ, where they sought to review certain ballots. Once it was determined that the number they wanted to review/disqualify wouldn't change the outcome of the race, they dropped the case. Working to improve the system is a great idea, but how you come up with a 'fool-proof' system i do not know. Especially if any instance of issue results in invalidating an election.</blockquote>