Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aries" data-source="post: 3473131" data-attributes="member: 44328"><p>The point is that if we follow the same path that some countries have taken, especially in pursuing bad ideas, we introduce potential for the same result. When you introduce change, it's not enough to have good intentions, you have to consider the potential for abuse. Several countries have a "vote" but it doesn't do much because of fear of repercussions if you don't vote the "right" way. Requiring any kind of identifying mark on ballots takes us in that direction.</p><p></p><p>I don't think anything needs to be changed as far as "in person" voting is concerned. I'm not opposed to requiring ID, I'm not sure why some are. There is a system in place to require you to acknowledge that you received one and only one ballot.</p><p></p><p>I don't know that much about mail-in voting. There was some discussion about it a while back. I'm not going to jump into the if and how much fraud there was, I'll let those investigations play out. In other words, I'm sure it's not perfect but I'm not sure how bad it is. I'll just say no one considered it to be that big of a problem until Trump said he couldn't lose any other way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aries, post: 3473131, member: 44328"] The point is that if we follow the same path that some countries have taken, especially in pursuing bad ideas, we introduce potential for the same result. When you introduce change, it's not enough to have good intentions, you have to consider the potential for abuse. Several countries have a "vote" but it doesn't do much because of fear of repercussions if you don't vote the "right" way. Requiring any kind of identifying mark on ballots takes us in that direction. I don't think anything needs to be changed as far as "in person" voting is concerned. I'm not opposed to requiring ID, I'm not sure why some are. There is a system in place to require you to acknowledge that you received one and only one ballot. I don't know that much about mail-in voting. There was some discussion about it a while back. I'm not going to jump into the if and how much fraud there was, I'll let those investigations play out. In other words, I'm sure it's not perfect but I'm not sure how bad it is. I'll just say no one considered it to be that big of a problem until Trump said he couldn't lose any other way. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom