Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 3474572" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>Well, as i wrote it there i meant in court. That each presentation has, as of yet, failed to convince any judge at any level. And that the filings themselves have been riddled with errors (like quoting things that do not exist, asking for things that cannot be granted, etc).</p><p></p><p>Perhaps the cases will go higher and convince the SCOTUS. Perhaps not.</p><p></p><p>But as an example, the judge in the AZ case said, “Not only have Plaintiffs failed to provide the Court with factual support for their extraordinary claims, but they have wholly failed to establish that they have standing for the Court to consider them."</p><p></p><p>And</p><p></p><p>“Allegations that find favor in the public sphere of gossip and innuendo cannot be a substitute for earnest pleadings and procedure in federal court.”</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 3474572, member: 277"] Well, as i wrote it there i meant in court. That each presentation has, as of yet, failed to convince any judge at any level. And that the filings themselves have been riddled with errors (like quoting things that do not exist, asking for things that cannot be granted, etc). Perhaps the cases will go higher and convince the SCOTUS. Perhaps not. But as an example, the judge in the AZ case said, “Not only have Plaintiffs failed to provide the Court with factual support for their extraordinary claims, but they have wholly failed to establish that they have standing for the Court to consider them." And “Allegations that find favor in the public sphere of gossip and innuendo cannot be a substitute for earnest pleadings and procedure in federal court.” [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom