Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Veterans' gun rights a sticky issue in defense bill
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lurker66" data-source="post: 2012794" data-attributes="member: 24459"><p>So we're back to the OP's question? Should a Vet who has been diagnosed as being "too mentally incompetant" be allowed to buy guns? Again the argument isnt about being able to manage finances or who flags them.</p><p></p><p>Are you "ok" with a diagnosed mentally incompetant person, Vet or not, owning or buying firearms? </p><p></p><p>Do a little google foo and see how many Vets commit suicide, kill loved ones or commit murder and have been diagnosed with PTSD or other mental illnesses. The stats are piling up. Theres been tons of research and stats from the Viet Nam war as well. Mental illness, whether its called mental incompetance or not, is something very serious in our returning Vets. </p><p></p><p>VA Dr.'s flagging them, while illegal, might not be a bad thing. Thats why we need to have this conversation.</p><p></p><p>Should a VA Dr. automatically send the Vet before a Judge? A judge isnt a Dr. but he would prolly rely on the Dr's testamony and diagnosis.</p><p></p><p>Should a Dr. even report it to anyone? Just stay quiet and mind his business? Let the chips fall where ever?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lurker66, post: 2012794, member: 24459"] So we're back to the OP's question? Should a Vet who has been diagnosed as being "too mentally incompetant" be allowed to buy guns? Again the argument isnt about being able to manage finances or who flags them. Are you "ok" with a diagnosed mentally incompetant person, Vet or not, owning or buying firearms? Do a little google foo and see how many Vets commit suicide, kill loved ones or commit murder and have been diagnosed with PTSD or other mental illnesses. The stats are piling up. Theres been tons of research and stats from the Viet Nam war as well. Mental illness, whether its called mental incompetance or not, is something very serious in our returning Vets. VA Dr.'s flagging them, while illegal, might not be a bad thing. Thats why we need to have this conversation. Should a VA Dr. automatically send the Vet before a Judge? A judge isnt a Dr. but he would prolly rely on the Dr's testamony and diagnosis. Should a Dr. even report it to anyone? Just stay quiet and mind his business? Let the chips fall where ever? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Veterans' gun rights a sticky issue in defense bill
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom