Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Blue Heeler" data-source="post: 4337014" data-attributes="member: 46613">I would like to see a debate with moderators that were not media talking heads.&nbsp; The moderators … they would write their questions so the risk of being leaked is minimized.&nbsp; I would suggest having a credible conservative economist (such as Steve Moore, Art Laffer, Larry Kudlow) and a credible liberal economist (maybe Larry Sommers).&nbsp; Have two moderators who are constitutional experts … on the left, Jonathan Turley and on the right Mark Levine.&nbsp; I would suggest Jeffry Toobin if he promised not to jerk off.&nbsp; Then a moderator for any “social” issues that could then tie back to any overriding constitutional or economic questions.&nbsp; On the right, maybe Ben Shapiro, Glenn Beck or Tucker Carlson (only if he promises not to laugh).&nbsp; On the left, Harold Ford, Jr.&nbsp; Being able to select the moderators would negate network bias and allow the debate to be on a vehicle for more people to be able to see.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Blue Heeler, post: 4337014, member: 46613"] I would like to see a debate with moderators that were not media talking heads. The moderators … they would write their questions so the risk of being leaked is minimized. I would suggest having a credible conservative economist (such as Steve Moore, Art Laffer, Larry Kudlow) and a credible liberal economist (maybe Larry Sommers). Have two moderators who are constitutional experts … on the left, Jonathan Turley and on the right Mark Levine. I would suggest Jeffry Toobin if he promised not to jerk off. Then a moderator for any “social” issues that could then tie back to any overriding constitutional or economic questions. On the right, maybe Ben Shapiro, Glenn Beck or Tucker Carlson (only if he promises not to laugh). On the left, Harold Ford, Jr. Being able to select the moderators would negate network bias and allow the debate to be on a vehicle for more people to be able to see. [/QUOTE]

Verification