Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Vote NO on 744
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bettingpython" data-source="post: 1343920" data-attributes="member: 4307"><p>Actually it goes into General fund revenue for districts the way it is written right now. the majority of a districts general fund account is usually allocated to payroll, the rest going to non bond able instructional materials, operations, maintenance and utilities, their is no pay increase mandate in the SQ. The states educators union initiated 744 when their pay raise legislation failed.</p><p></p><p>Claiming administrations are greedy and going to soak it up if it passes is BS, just like teachers their are laws regulating salaries and benefits of administration as well. Your posted argument is knee jerk reactionary bull puckey.</p><p></p><p>I am voting no because it pegs our spending levels to a benchmark level determined by other states and because their is no source of funding, unfunded mandates will destroy district finances and budgets, we should not be constitutionally required to spend money because another state spends more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bettingpython, post: 1343920, member: 4307"] Actually it goes into General fund revenue for districts the way it is written right now. the majority of a districts general fund account is usually allocated to payroll, the rest going to non bond able instructional materials, operations, maintenance and utilities, their is no pay increase mandate in the SQ. The states educators union initiated 744 when their pay raise legislation failed. Claiming administrations are greedy and going to soak it up if it passes is BS, just like teachers their are laws regulating salaries and benefits of administration as well. Your posted argument is knee jerk reactionary bull puckey. I am voting no because it pegs our spending levels to a benchmark level determined by other states and because their is no source of funding, unfunded mandates will destroy district finances and budgets, we should not be constitutionally required to spend money because another state spends more. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Vote NO on 744
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
