Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Warrantless search - Rogers County
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tweetr" data-source="post: 3944614" data-attributes="member: 5183"><p>Dunno, still looking into it.</p><p>Here is what I'd like to see: run the dog in exactly the same manner on the police car that made the stop, and compare the dog's reaction to the police car with the dog's reaction to the subject car. That would in effect be a control toward establishing legitimate, as opposed to pretextual, probable cause for a search. That would not eliminate signalling of the dog by the handler as a factor, but it would still be instructive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tweetr, post: 3944614, member: 5183"] Dunno, still looking into it. Here is what I'd like to see: run the dog in exactly the same manner on the police car that made the stop, and compare the dog's reaction to the police car with the dog's reaction to the subject car. That would in effect be a control toward establishing legitimate, as opposed to pretextual, probable cause for a search. That would not eliminate signalling of the dog by the handler as a factor, but it would still be instructive. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Warrantless search - Rogers County
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom