Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Warrantless search - Rogers County
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CanadianRiverRat" data-source="post: 3944625" data-attributes="member: 51093"><p>I am not, and never have been a LEO but I find no fault in an officer responding as such. If you exhibit nervous or erratic behaviour around me, then be assured I presume the possibility you're up to something, are possibly armed and my mindset immediately goes to "prepare to engage". So no, I can't fault an officer for being suspicious and then verifying no weapons present, particularly when if he didn't and a gunfight ensued the armchair quarterbacks would hold him at fault for not checking, esp. if an innocent got injured.</p><p>I see it as a situation of damned if you do, damned if you don't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CanadianRiverRat, post: 3944625, member: 51093"] I am not, and never have been a LEO but I find no fault in an officer responding as such. If you exhibit nervous or erratic behaviour around me, then be assured I presume the possibility you're up to something, are possibly armed and my mindset immediately goes to "prepare to engage". So no, I can't fault an officer for being suspicious and then verifying no weapons present, particularly when if he didn't and a gunfight ensued the armchair quarterbacks would hold him at fault for not checking, esp. if an innocent got injured. I see it as a situation of damned if you do, damned if you don't. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Warrantless search - Rogers County
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom