Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Warrantless search - Rogers County
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OK Corgi Rancher" data-source="post: 3944631" data-attributes="member: 45773"><p>That's because you're viewing things objectively and as a realist. Not as someone who lives in fantasy land. Courts oftentimes side with your point of view.</p><p></p><p>Tweetr believes there is never an occasion where an officer can conduct a search or seizure without a warrant. He believes that because he doesn't understand some fundamental concepts such as "un/reasonable" or "totality of circumstances". He also has no clue how law enforcement works.</p><p></p><p>He's butt hurt over this issue and he's butt hurt because things in reality are different than how he'd like them to be. I feel that way, too, but it doesn't hurt my feelings. He also likes to use emotionally charged terms like "torn apart" to describe what the officers allegedly did to his son's car. He does that, as do other people, to elicit an emotional response and to gain validation from others. Not because it's really accurate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OK Corgi Rancher, post: 3944631, member: 45773"] That's because you're viewing things objectively and as a realist. Not as someone who lives in fantasy land. Courts oftentimes side with your point of view. Tweetr believes there is never an occasion where an officer can conduct a search or seizure without a warrant. He believes that because he doesn't understand some fundamental concepts such as "un/reasonable" or "totality of circumstances". He also has no clue how law enforcement works. He's butt hurt over this issue and he's butt hurt because things in reality are different than how he'd like them to be. I feel that way, too, but it doesn't hurt my feelings. He also likes to use emotionally charged terms like "torn apart" to describe what the officers allegedly did to his son's car. He does that, as do other people, to elicit an emotional response and to gain validation from others. Not because it's really accurate. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Warrantless search - Rogers County
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom