Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chuckie" data-source="post: 3944742" data-attributes="member: 42584">- You certainly have the right to believe that under the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution you are allowed to possess any &quot;arms&quot; (meaning weapon) because possession of arms &quot;shall not be infringed&quot;, however, I would challenge that belief simply by saying that the Federal government (warden of the Constitution) would take action to ensure that you did not possess (for example) WMD&#039;s under ANY condition.- Furthermore I submit that the term &quot;unreasonable&quot; under the 4th Amendment when referring to a search is, at best, subjective and therefore cannot be explicitly defined.&nbsp; What is &#039;unreasonable&#039; to you may be reasonable to me.- Thank you Tweetr for the interactions, fore it surely has been both pleasurable and interesting. Hope the rest of your week goes well, my friend.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chuckie, post: 3944742, member: 42584"] - You certainly have the right to believe that under the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution you are allowed to possess [B]any [/B]"arms" (meaning weapon) because possession of arms "shall not be infringed", however, I would challenge that belief simply by saying that the Federal government (warden of the Constitution) would take action to ensure that you did not possess (for example) WMD's under ANY condition. - Furthermore I submit that the term [B]"unreasonable[/B]" under the 4th Amendment when referring to a search is, at best, subjective and therefore cannot be explicitly defined. What is 'unreasonable' to you may be reasonable to me. - Thank you [I]Tweetr[/I] for the interactions, fore it surely has been both pleasurable and interesting. Hope the rest of your week goes well, my friend. [/QUOTE]

Verification