Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tweetr" data-source="post: 3959867" data-attributes="member: 5183">Well, that is the substance of the matter, isn't it? Did they "support, obey, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma." As the US Constitution is first and both are substantially parallel, for simplicity consider just the US Constition.Did the deputies in this instance:1) Violate his right as a person to be secure in his person, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizure?To answer that it is necessary to check off the requirements:Did they:2) Search persuant to a warrant? (No.)3) Issued upon probable cause? (Partially. They established probable cause to search a third brake light, but not the rest of the car with a dog.)4) Supported by oath or affirmation? (No.)5) Particularly describing the place to be searched? (No.)6) Particularly describing the persons or things to be seized? (No.)In what way does that satisfy their required oath to "support, obey, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma?"</blockquote>