Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Washington State Democrats Push Ban on 51 Specific Firearms
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PBramble" data-source="post: 3731920" data-attributes="member: 5778"><p>A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon, unless the firearm is a pistol as defined in this section;</p><p></p><p>So they've taken on the role of the ATF by defining what consitutes a banned weapon in their eyes? This whole thing sounds like infringement. Non-compliance is the only answer if it passes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PBramble, post: 3731920, member: 5778"] A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon, unless the firearm is a pistol as defined in this section; So they've taken on the role of the ATF by defining what consitutes a banned weapon in their eyes? This whole thing sounds like infringement. Non-compliance is the only answer if it passes. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Washington State Democrats Push Ban on 51 Specific Firearms
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom