Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
We dont need the 2nd Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dugby" data-source="post: 2057092" data-attributes="member: 7393"><p>I agree with your reasoning except where you find fault with the author for leaving something out. He could not cover everything. I am very confident that the author would agree with your remaining points, They are very valid and substantive points which you presented well. Some of the early supreme court rulings dealt with how a prohibited weapon (A sawed off shotgun in the case I remember) wouldn't have any place in a battlefield and could thereby be regulated without impinging the 2nd. Like it or not the government violates the second amendment by every firearms law on the books. They also violate our natural rights in the same way. We are a society of men and not a society of laws. Haven't been for 100 plus years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dugby, post: 2057092, member: 7393"] I agree with your reasoning except where you find fault with the author for leaving something out. He could not cover everything. I am very confident that the author would agree with your remaining points, They are very valid and substantive points which you presented well. Some of the early supreme court rulings dealt with how a prohibited weapon (A sawed off shotgun in the case I remember) wouldn't have any place in a battlefield and could thereby be regulated without impinging the 2nd. Like it or not the government violates the second amendment by every firearms law on the books. They also violate our natural rights in the same way. We are a society of men and not a society of laws. Haven't been for 100 plus years. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
We dont need the 2nd Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom