Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="flybeech" data-source="post: 2071021" data-attributes="member: 7557">I understand that you have got to support and defend Sheriff Whetsel, because he is likely your best customer. Sheriff Whetsel puts food on your table with impound calls of Oklahoma County residents vehicles, right? I don't blame you for defending who might be your most profitable customer, but the business relationship should be in the disclosure. I get that it's unwise to bite the hand that feeds you.I don't have any financial interest in Sheriff Whetsel, other than I pay taxes that his office soaks up. I have spoken with Sheriff Whetsel, exchanged emails and read lots of information on him. IMHO, Sheriff Whetsel is a Federalized, militarized police organization with very close ties to the Department of Homeland Security. He is past President of the International Chiefs of Police and has a decades long history of being anti-Second Amendment. Anyone with the internet can see the truth of Sheriff Whetsel.Okiebryan, I think you are a great spokesman who has done a lot for the cause. I sat there and loudly cheered you yesterday, because you deserve it. I respect and honor you for all the good things you have done and I roundly agree that you are a 2%er, when it comes to defending the 2A. You're an all-around stand-up guy. I don't fault you in the least for having a close financial dependency with Sheriff Whetsel's office. Business is business. I know you can't come out and say that he is a globalist tool who would disarm Oklahomans at the drop of a hat, like I can. Considering your relationship with Whetsel, it might be best to avoid discussions that involve your best customer, altogether.</blockquote>

Verification