Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Method" data-source="post: 4251051" data-attributes="member: 51132">Yeah, not sure about the cursing part.&nbsp; Personally, while working I wouldn&#039;t be doing that in casual or business conversations anyway but it varies among people.&nbsp;&nbsp; If OKC&#039;s are truly activated automatically, I&#039;m glad to see that there has been some lessons learned in that regard about &#039;selectively activated&#039; body cams.&nbsp; If they don&#039;t &#039;choose&#039; to turn them on as you say, at least there have been some lessons learned on that based on unethical behavior by some in the past.No, the article doesn&#039;t contradict my statement.&nbsp; I read the whole article and I am fully aware of the George Mason study part.&nbsp; That is part of the reason I chose to include the article, as it sadly lends itself to the possibility that some law enforcement want body cams, *as&nbsp; long as* they can activate them selectively.&nbsp; I do appreciate you making my point for me.....I had actually hoped someone would point that out.&nbsp;&nbsp; I&#039;m glad you did; thank you for that....it helped prove my point better than I could have on my own.As far as the &#039;casting the net too wide&#039; accusation....I&#039;m fully aware that not all law enforcement personnel are like that.&nbsp; But enough have been historically that is is clearly a huge issue.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Method, post: 4251051, member: 51132"] Yeah, not sure about the cursing part. Personally, while working I wouldn't be doing that in casual or business conversations anyway but it varies among people. If OKC's are truly activated automatically, I'm glad to see that there has been some lessons learned in that regard about 'selectively activated' body cams. If they don't 'choose' to turn them on as you say, at least there have been some lessons learned on that based on unethical behavior by some in the past. No, the article doesn't contradict my statement. I read the whole article and I am fully aware of the George Mason study part. That is part of the reason I chose to include the article, as it sadly lends itself to the possibility that some law enforcement want body cams, *as long as* they can activate them selectively. I do appreciate you making my point for me.....I had actually hoped someone would point that out. I'm glad you did; thank you for that....it helped prove my point better than I could have on my own. As far as the 'casting the net too wide' accusation....I'm fully aware that not all law enforcement personnel are like that. But enough have been historically that is is clearly a huge issue. [/QUOTE]

Verification