Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What are your thoughts on sections 1.8.12 through 1.8.16 of the US Constitution?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2082590" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>I'd say the world has moved on. In the days of the Founding Fathers, even a minor threat to the nation could take weeks or even months, to develop and transit. Now it's a mere hours or in the case of ICBM's, minutes. </p><p></p><p>We must unfortunatley continue to field and support a standing army. However, the current doctrine of expeditionary wars is unnecessary and in contrast with the intent of the Founders.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2082590, member: 1132"] I'd say the world has moved on. In the days of the Founding Fathers, even a minor threat to the nation could take weeks or even months, to develop and transit. Now it's a mere hours or in the case of ICBM's, minutes. We must unfortunatley continue to field and support a standing army. However, the current doctrine of expeditionary wars is unnecessary and in contrast with the intent of the Founders. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What are your thoughts on sections 1.8.12 through 1.8.16 of the US Constitution?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
